…I simply do not understand, chemically, how macroevolution could have happened. When hearing such extrapolations in the academy, when will we cry out, “The emperor has no clothes!”? On Professor Tour’s Website, there’s a very revealing article on evolution and creation, in which Tour bluntly states that he does not understand how macroevolution could have happened, from a chemical standpoint (all bold emphases below are mine – VJT):Īlthough most scientists leave few stones unturned in their quest to discern mechanisms before wholeheartedly accepting them, when it comes to the often gross extrapolations between observations and conclusions on macroevolution, scientists, it seems to me, permit unhealthy leeway. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.” Although he does not regard himself as an Intelligent Design theorist, Professor Tour, along with over 700 other scientists, took the courageous step back in 2001 of signing the Discovery Institute’s “A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism”, which read: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. He has authored or co-authored 489 scientific publications and his name is on 36 patents. He is currently a Professor of Chemistry, Professor of Computer Science, and Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Rice University.
![platypus evolution not working on galaxy tab 4 platypus evolution not working on galaxy tab 4](https://3dprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CraftMake.png)
He is famous for his work on nanocars (pictured above, courtesy of Wikipedia), nanoelectronics, graphene nanostructures, carbon nanovectors in medicine, and green carbon research for enhanced oil recovery and environmentally friendly oil and gas extraction. Tour is one of the ten most cited chemists in the world.